It has been more than
a little surprising for me to watch the continuing fuss being made over Prime
Minister Justin Trudeau’s appearances in black (and brown) face make-up.
Although the community I grew up in and the schools I attended were all “integrated”,
I have always been aware that prejudice against Canadians with dark skins
exists and is difficult for them. To put it mildly. I have seen and felt that
prejudice in action. However, I have also always believed that in Canada there
is redress for those whose lives are impacted by such prejudice. There are laws
forbidding it. There is good will and
friendship. If I had thought about it, I would have said that appearing as a ‘genie’
at a costume party would not be particularly offensive to anyone. And I would
have cited the Liberal party as providing leadership in fighting prejudice.
So, what is with
Justin and the multiple appearances in offensive costume? Why, it appears to me as being the principle
question, was this not addressed when he first appeared on the scene as a leadership
candidate? I suspect there are two aspects to the omission, if omission it was.
One is that the people vetting Trudeau were, like me, smug members of the
Anglo-Saxon majority and dismissive of ‘youthful’ peccadillos. Again, as I have
been, lacking in awareness of what a big deal anything that looks like
political incorrectness has become. And, most important, Trudeau junior just
had too many attractive qualities that would allow the Liberal party to do well
at election time. The same qualities, in some cases, that lured him into
putting the make-up on.
The man has charisma,
good looks, polished delivery of platitudes that he obviously seems to believe
and a distinguished background as the son of a very clever politician. We
watched him grow up. We were moved by his eulogy of his father. He fit into the
political world quickly and well. His good looks and athleticism were a fine
show of what a Canadian could be, we thought. He is a winner, we all thought.
Does it matter that he does not have a resume of increasingly responsible
positions in management and government to offer as evidence of his ability to
lead? Men with those qualities had not proved out, recently, to be election
winners. And in order to govern, hey, first you have to win.
My father’s family was
large L Liberal. I grew up both liberal and Liberal. I was proud to be a member
of the party that could offer Lester Pearson and Pierre Trudeau as leaders,
backed by talented if unruly cabinets. But along the way, the large L fell out of my value
system. I thought Chretien did a good job, mostly, but his resume was pretty
thin. At least, as a career politician, he had held and done well in
responsible cabinet posts. So had Paul Martin Jr done well in Finance, but it
turned out that he did not have the ability to lead. And it has just gone
downhill ever since. We seem to be unable to produce people who have the
qualities to do the job and also want the job.
I have heard from more
than one source that none of the leaders of the parties in contention in this
federal election are appealing candidates. The Conservative Party leader is a
colourless man whose speaking style does not inspire. Nor does his party’s
platform. The NDP is weak and the Green Party insular; both of them lack any
experience in their senior ranks of actual governing and their talking points
reflect this. The other choice is Mr. Charm. Mr. Sunny Ways. Mr. Dress-up. He
is certainly not colourless. He talks a fine line. In the last election he
pulled his party with him to a credible win. It will be interesting to see if
he can get past this set of blunders and present himself and his party as a
credible choice.
Me, I don’t want to
vote for any of them. I will have to look only at the local candidates. And
maybe hold my nose.
