I know that English, like all spoken languages, is mutable. The speakers determine, over time, expression, vowel placement and sound, consonant use, definition. But, knowing that, I mourn for some of the grace notes that I was taught were correct and that I no longer hear used.
For one, the use of few/fewer and less.
The distinction between a numeric noun or group and a general one is vanishing,
even on CBC and other bastions of good speech. “I hear less birdsong because
there are fewer birds.’ Generic ‘birdsong’, no quantity. Numeric for ‘birds’
because they are countable. “I will have less of that noise in the back of the
class, thank you.” Fewer than five turkeys survived the winter.” Fewer people than formerly make this
distinction.
And then there are those delightful verbs to lie
and to lay. Mostly, to lay is used correctly in the present and
past tenses. “The hen lays and egg. The duck laid an egg yesterday. Both of
them have laid sporadically this year.” Got that? It is to lie that gets
all messed up. “The fallen statue lies face up. It lay there yesterday. I think
it must have lain there for longer than that.” When is the last time you heard
someone use lain. You hear “He laid there (sometimes spelled layed) all
night.” I used to introduce this concept to the Grade 9 classes by telling them
that “You have to LAY something.” And then I would pause and wait for the boys
to stop snickering. But, some of them at least remembered. Of course - “Now I
lay me down to sleep; I pray the Lord my soul to keep.”
When I hear someone using ‘fulsome’ to describe a generously
complete action or item – “He gave a fulsome report, leaving nothing out.” – it
rattles me. I learned the word as denoting an insincere overabundance. “Fulsome
praise” was too much, over the top, embarrassing. I once had a discussion about
me described as “fulsome”. When I called the speaker on it, he assured me that
all he had meant was that there had been a lot of it. But. This man was a
writer and former English teacher and lecturer. He knew both meanings. And I
knew which one he intended.
I have on my desk, tucked behind the computer monitor,
Fowler’s English Usage, The Oxford Reference Dictionary, Dreyer’s
English and the MLA Style Manual. If the Dreyer title is not
familiar, Ben Dreyer was the Copy Chief at Random House for many years and so
you might be more familiar with the Penguin Style and Usage title.
And I still get things wrong on a regular basis.
Mutable, right?
Those first two usages also grind on me. I haven't noticed fulsome, but I have probably thought of it wrongly, so I wouldn't have noticed.
ReplyDeleteIt is still not 4am, and I am up licking my wounds and having my first coffee. I am not a joyous camper at the moment.
On my second coffee here. Glad to have your company in the word wars. And not happy about the pain and stuff you are having. Sympathy, for sure.
ReplyDeleteLately, I have been hearing this obnoxious construction:
ReplyDeleteThis is where all the cars are at.
I don't know where she put the grapes at.
Add to that the constant usage of the perfect tense verb Seen used alone instead of the past tense Saw (I seen that the car was coming way too fast).
These are absolutely and truly painful for me. Thus, when I see the sign at my grocery store above the quick check aisle that says 12 Items Or Fewer, my heart gladdens every single time.
You know you have my profound empathy. We fight it every day, together.
Nance, oh my yes!!! to the "are at". "Off of" is another one. And misuse of perfect tenses can be, um, tense. My former son-in-law, a PhD (admittedly in Physics) once said "I have went" in front of my husband. Who corrected him. Then SIL said that this usage was okay in Scotland (his country of origin). We were all together in a lineup of some kind when this happened and I had to use a bathroom break as an excuse to have a private meltdown. Luckily my daughter ditched this young man.
DeleteYou and me, sister. To the barricades. To the end.
My "favourites" are.... should of, would of, could of. And don't forget.... I should of went yesterday.... and.... I seen the movie last week. And oftentimes. Is that a word? Can't we just say often?
DeleteSee my comment to Nance, above this one for the 'went' error - but yours is worse and, sadly, funnier. Useless 'of' additions are right up there; you are, um, right on. I have not encountered 'oftentimes'. Yikes.
DeleteI even heard "oftentimes" spoken on the CBC!!!!! Wince.....
DeleteMary, the English language is fascinating in its differentiation between word usage. Recently I was trying to decide whether laying or lying (down) would have been the best word to use when describing that I was taking it easy after a knee injury. In the end, I decided on an entirely different word choose.
ReplyDeleteWhen in doubt, dodge. I actually used to teach that. Good one. However, if it was you, you would have been lying down. If me, I would probably be laying down the law.
ReplyDelete